![]() ![]() "The court has ordered us to put a more complex explanation on the ballot, which we know can often lead to voter confusion, but we'll follow the court's directive.” What did opponents want changed? “Our goal in approving the ballot language for Issue 1 was to make it as clear and concise as possible," LaRose spokesman Rob Nichols said. Secretary of State Frank LaRose's office scheduled a Ballot Board meeting for Tuesday in response to the ruling. "We're glad the Ohio Supreme Court saw through the deception and ordered changes." "The language politicians and special interests wanted on our ballots for Issue 1 was full of lies," said Dennis Willard, a spokesman for the coalition. ![]() The group is also challenging the legality of the August election, which the state Supreme Court has yet to rule on. The One Person One Vote coalition, joined by three Ohio voters, sued over the language after the Ballot Board approved it, despite objections from Democrats. 8 whether it should take 60% of the vote to amend the constitution, instead of a simple majority of 50% plus one.ĭig deeper: How 60% rule would have changed Ohio Constitution The Republican-leaning court ordered the board to revisit part of the title and correct an error in the measure, known as Issue 1. The Ohio Ballot Board must rewrite some of the ballot language for the August issue to make it harder to amend Ohio's Constitution, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled Monday.īut a 4-3 majority on the court backed other language that opponents said is inaccurate and would mislead voters. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |